[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1DE067.9090408@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:52:55 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: MCE: Fix for mce_panic_timeout
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com> writes:
>> - In case of panic_timeout > 0 and mce_bootlog == 0.
>> System should reboot after panic, but it doesn't on mce panic because
>> current mce code overwrite panic_timeout to 0.
>
> Nope, with bootlog==0 it should _not_ automatically reboot on panic.
> Automatic rebooting makes mainly sense with boot logging, otherwise
> you will likely lose the information. Or at least the kernel
> cannot know if you lose information or not so it has to err on
> the safe side.
Users already know they might lose the information about the panic
if panic_timeout > 0. It is same on all kind of panic.
> I changed it now to only override with panic_timeout == 0,
> as in the user didn't set anything,
> that's probably the most sensible semantics anyways.
It's OK with me.
The logic in this patch also seems good.
But...
> v2: Only force panic timeout when it's shorter (H.Seto)
> v3: Only panic when there is no earlier timeout or it's not zero
> (based on comment H.Seto)
"Only panic when ..." ?
I could not cache the meaning of this changelog.
Thanks,
H.Seto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists