[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243514416.6600.74.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:40:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Support current clocksource handling in
fallback sched_clock().
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > @@ -437,10 +441,19 @@ void clocksource_unregister(struct clocksource *cs)
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&clocksource_lock, flags);
> > +
> > + if (sched_clocksource == cs) {
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Refusing to unregister "
> > + "scheduler clocksource %s", cs->name);
>
> Hmm, isn't that dangerous ? The clocksource might be in a module or
> in kmalloced memory which is going to be freed.
One could play dirty tricks with 'leaking' module ref counts and such so
as to avoid that. The alternative is making sched_clock() look something
like:
u64 __weak sched_clock(void)
{
struct clocksource *clock;
u64 time;
rcu_read_lock();
clock = rcu_dereference(sched_clocksource);
time = cyc2ns(clock, read_clocksource(clock));
rcu_read_unlock;
return time;
}
and make the module unload do a sync_rcu -- but this might be a little
overkill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists