[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090528141648.GA6018@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:16:50 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: annotate emit_log_char() notrace
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:00:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> printk calls emit_log_char() in a loop which is cluttering the trace
> buffer. Make it notrace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
Does it produce that much annoying traces?
I mean, printk() are usually rare events.
Do you have a particular debugging workflow that makes this
function invasive in the trace?
May be it's because you are debugging using ftrace and other
debugging options that use a lot of printk()
In such case, it would indeed be good to apply this patch.
Thanks,
Frederic.
> kernel/printk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/printk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/printk.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ static void call_console_drivers(unsigne
> _call_console_drivers(start_print, end, msg_level);
> }
>
> -static void emit_log_char(char c)
> +static void notrace emit_log_char(char c)
> {
> LOG_BUF(log_end) = c;
> log_end++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists