[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243527218.28705.35.camel@desktop>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:13:38 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Support current clocksource handling in
fallback sched_clock().
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 14:59 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>
> CPU0 CPU1
>
> clock = ACCESS_ONCE(sched_clocksource);
>
> unload module
> clocksource_unregister()
> sched_clocksource = jiffies
> unmap data/text
>
> cyc2ns(clock, clocksource_read(clock)) <--- fireworks
>
>
Do any module based clocksources even exist right now?
clocksource_unregister only seems to be used 3 times..
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists