linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: pxa tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f17812d70905271936x58f424deq583357279d24d78a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 10:36:19 +0800
From:	Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Tomas 'Sleep_Walker' Cech" <sleep_walker@...e.cz>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: pxa tree build failure

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Today's linux-next build (most of the arm configs) failed like this:
>
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:839: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_is_treo680'
>
> Caused by commit c81fe1207795c71a6933f84d62ded0946a6af8a4 ("[ARM]
> pxa/treo680: initial support").
>

Yeah, that depends on the mach-types being updated, and we are
still discussing about that. I'll temporarily move that commit off the
branch, and put it back once ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/