linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.29+ NFS-Server Problem "reconnect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090528203228.GA6056@geggus.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 22:32:28 +0200
From:	Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.29+ NFS-Server Problem "reconnect_path: npd != pd"

J. Bruce Fields schrieb am Donnerstag, den 28. Mai um 22:28 Uhr:

> Looks like you have subtree_check set on the "bad" export, and
> no_subtree_check set on the "good" export.  subtree_check can result in
> spurious stale errors when files are renamed, so it's possible this is
> by design.
> 
> You say you get that message on 296.29.x but not 2.6.27.x.

Exactly! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=527517
may refer the same bug.

> And you say you also get stale filehandle errors.

Only on 2.6.29.x. Everything works fine qwith the older Kernel.

>  I assume you didn't get the same stale filehandle errors on 2.6.27.x?

No errors on the older Kernel.

Sven

-- 
"In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money than it is at making good
operating systems" (Linus Torvalds, August 1997)

/me is giggls@...net, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/