[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40905272036ueb35e6do86160788ab7c7d8a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:36:08 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>,
Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:57 PM, David Gibson
<david@...son.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> Grant mentions the Xilinx devices as an example - they're interesting
> because of the fancy stuff they're doing, autogenerating the devtree
> from the FPGA configuration. But to me the real indicator of the
> device tree's value is the handful of platforms for which support has
> been added with *only* a new dts - a single, fairly simple text file.
Yes, exactly! Even with the .dtb blob linked into the kernel image
this has been a huge win in simplicity.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists