[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243584793.23657.168.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:13:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] perf_counter: Don't swap contexts containing
locked mutex
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:06 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> static struct perf_counter_ctx *pin_ctx(struct perf_counter *counter, u64 *old_gen)
> {
> struct perf_counter_context *ctx;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> retry:
> ctx = rcu_dereference(counter->ctx);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> if (ctx != rcu_dereference(counter->ctx))
> goto retry;
>
> *old_gen = ctx->generation;
> ctx->generation = ~0ULL;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return ctx;
> }
>
> static void unpin_ctx(struct perf_counter_ctx *ctx, u64 old_gen)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
> ctx->generation = old_gen;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
> }
OK, I think I got this wrong, counter->ctx isn't the problem.
task->perf_counter_ctx is.
Still would be nice to write it in the above form. I'll go over the code
again to see who else might want it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists