linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: add localversion to avoid confusion and conflicts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200905291129.30296.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2009 11:29:29 +0200
From:	Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: add localversion to avoid confusion and conflicts

Am Freitag 29 Mai 2009 10:43:46 schrieb Jaswinder Singh Rajput:
> > > Adding localversion avoids confusion in kernel images :
> > NAK from my side. If you need a distinction, there is always
> Here is NAK for your NAK from my side.
> This patch is only for KVM tree and not for linus tree.

I know that this is for the kvm tree.
I personally dont like to have a forced localversion in my kernel trees - it 
might break my tooling. 
Anyway, If it really makes your life better I can live with these localversion 
files and adopt my tooling.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/