[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A204EFC.501@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:09:16 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Olaf Kirch <okir@...e.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Becky Bruce <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] swiotlb: use dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma
Ian Campbell wrote:
> static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev,
> volatile void *address)
> {
> - return swiotlb_phys_to_bus(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address));
> + return phys_to_dma(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address));
> }
>
> void * __weak swiotlb_bus_to_virt(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t address)
>
Does this need to be weak too?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists