[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A204EFC.501@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2009 14:09:16 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Olaf Kirch <okir@...e.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Becky Bruce <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] swiotlb: use dma_to_phys and phys_to_dma
Ian Campbell wrote:
> static dma_addr_t swiotlb_virt_to_bus(struct device *hwdev,
>  				      volatile void *address)
>  {
> -	return swiotlb_phys_to_bus(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address));
> +	return phys_to_dma(hwdev, virt_to_phys(address));
>  }
>  
>  void * __weak swiotlb_bus_to_virt(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t address)
>   
Does this need to be weak too?
    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
