[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090529053701.GB13657@ywang-moblin2.bj.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:37:02 +0800
From: Yong Wang <yong.y.wang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Remove masking and unmasking of
LVT error register.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:33:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'd suggest to remove the 'nmi' parameter as well to this function.
Thanks for the comment. Just resubmitted a new patch removing the 'nmi'
parameter.
> (and any other dynamic flags that deal with nmi/irq distinctions)
Just wanna make sure before moving on. You want to remove things like
the 'nmi' field in perf_counter_hw_event and hw_perf_counter structs and
the 'nmi' parameter of perf_counter_overflow and perf_swcounter_event
functions, etc. Right?
Thanks
-Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists