lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090530134601.GA12088@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sat, 30 May 2009 15:46:01 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jkacur@...hat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, mtosatti@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter tools: Generate per command manpages (and pdf/html, etc.)

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 01:00:33PM +0000, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Commit-ID:  c1c2365acf8c044f749c0fe1ea236497e8d1718e
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c1c2365acf8c044f749c0fe1ea236497e8d1718e
> Author:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> AuthorDate: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:38:51 +0200
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:52:44 +0200
> 
> perf_counter tools: Generate per command manpages (and pdf/html, etc.)
> 
> Import Git's nice .txt => {man/html/pdf} generation machinery.
> 
> Fix various errors in the Documentation/perf*.txt description as well.
> 
> Also fix a bug in builtin-help: we'd map 'perf help top' to 'perftop'
> if only the 'perf' binary is in the default PATH - confusing the manpage
> logic. I dont fully understand why Git did it this way - but i suppose
> it's a migration artifact from their migration from standalone git-xyz
> commands to 'git xyz' commands. The perf tools were always using the
> modern form so it's not an issue there.

Can we please have this patch split in at least a infrastructire and
a content part.
This makes it easier to review - and also makes it
much more clear what is needed to be added when adding new
documentation following this format.

I would also suggest to copy Randy Dunlap on patches
touching generic parts like this in Documentation.

I will try to review this when the splitup has heppend.

[I may have been copied on stuff earlier but I has been
and is almost off-line atm].

Thanks,
	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ