[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510905300659p829b723hbbae72b49265d3ff@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:59:55 +0200
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] sysfs: Normalize removing sysfs directories.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 15:07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> My take is simply that a correct user has to wait until no one else
> can find the kobject before calling kobject_del. At which point
> races are impossible, and it doesn't matter if sysfs_mutex is held
> across the entire operation.
We have circular references between kobjects in some "advanced" users.
We can not break the circle without calling _del() on one of the
objects involved, but at that time all of the objects are still
referenced by another object. Only a _del() will break the circle, and
result in a release of the objects involved. Not sure how that would
behave with this change?
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists