[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090530172305.GA8985@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:23:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jkacur@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de, mtosatti@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter tools: Generate per
command manpages (and pdf/html, etc.)
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > > > Import Git's nice .txt => {man/html/pdf} generation machinery.
> >
> > The .txt files were already present, so the patch is largely the
> > infrastructure patch. The fixes to .txt files were minimal.
>
> We do not copy Git's .txt => {man/html/pdf} support only to
> support perfcounters.
>
> Either perfcounters use the infrastructure already present or it
> establish a parallel infrastrucutre we can start to migrate over
> to.
>
> In an area where there is so little interest shown as in
> documentation generation we do not want to have two different ways
> to generate man pages, html etc.
>
> IMO the ascii doc support from git is superior to what we have
> today so I am all for replacing the current stuff. But then we
> should do is properly and not as some perfconuter only stuff.
I still think you are misunderstanding it. It is a user-space
tool(-set) with its own needs to install manpages and other
documentation. Look at the code.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists