lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090530223830.GA30491@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 May 2009 00:38:30 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 04/12 v3] ptrace: introduce the empty "struct
	ptrace_context"

Suggested by Roland.

Introduce the new "struct ptrace_context" and add the pointer to task_struct.
The next patches will move all ptrace-related fields from task_struct into
this struct. From now, if the task was ever ptraced it has ->ptrace_ctx
!= NULL. Freed by free_task() along with task_struct itself.

With utrace based ptrace we can move this struct into utrace_engine->data.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---

 include/linux/sched.h     |    1 +
 include/linux/ptrace.h    |    4 ++++
 include/linux/tracehook.h |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/fork.c             |    5 +++++
 kernel/ptrace.c           |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 5 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- PTRACE/include/linux/sched.h~04_STRUCT	2009-05-30 21:18:38.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/sched.h	2009-05-30 22:48:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -1201,6 +1201,7 @@ struct task_struct {
 	struct list_head sibling;	/* linkage in my parent's children list */
 	struct task_struct *group_leader;	/* threadgroup leader */
 
+	struct ptrace_context *ptrace_ctx;
 	/*
 	 * ptraced is the list of tasks this task is using ptrace on.
 	 * This includes both natural children and PTRACE_ATTACH targets.
--- PTRACE/include/linux/ptrace.h~04_STRUCT	2009-05-30 22:44:41.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/ptrace.h	2009-05-30 22:48:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@
 #include <linux/compiler.h>		/* For unlikely.  */
 #include <linux/sched.h>		/* For struct task_struct.  */
 
+struct ptrace_context {
+};
+
+extern int alloc_ptrace_context(struct task_struct *child);
 
 extern long arch_ptrace(struct task_struct *child, long request, long addr, long data);
 extern int ptrace_traceme(void);
--- PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h~04_STRUCT	2009-05-30 22:41:45.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h	2009-05-30 22:48:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -243,6 +243,40 @@ static inline int tracehook_prepare_clon
 }
 
 /**
+ * tracehook_init_task - initialize the new task
+ * @task:		the task to initialize
+ * @clone_flags:	%CLONE_* flags from clone/fork/vfork system call
+ * @trace:		return value from tracehook_prepare_clone()
+ *
+ * This is called immediately after dup_task_struct().
+ * It must clear/reset any tracing state so that tracehook_free_task()
+ * will work safely if the task creation fails.  If the task creation
+ * succeeds, a tracehook_finish_clone() call will follow with locks
+ * held, before @task starts or is accessible to anyone else.
+ *
+ * Called with no locks held.
+ */
+static inline int tracehook_init_task(struct task_struct *task,
+					unsigned long clone_flags, int trace)
+{
+	task->ptrace_ctx = NULL;
+	if (unlikely((clone_flags & CLONE_PTRACE) || trace))
+		return alloc_ptrace_context(task);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * tracehook_free_task - task is about to be freed
+ * @task:		task that will be freed
+ *
+ * May be called from any context.
+ */
+static inline void tracehook_free_task(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	kfree(task->ptrace_ctx);
+}
+
+/**
  * tracehook_finish_clone - new child created and being attached
  * @child:		new child task
  * @clone_flags:	%CLONE_* flags from clone/fork/vfork system call
--- PTRACE/kernel/fork.c~04_STRUCT	2009-05-30 21:18:38.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/kernel/fork.c	2009-05-30 22:48:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	free_thread_info(tsk->stack);
 	rt_mutex_debug_task_free(tsk);
 	ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
+	tracehook_free_task(tsk);
 	free_task_struct(tsk);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task);
@@ -982,6 +983,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	if (!p)
 		goto fork_out;
 
+	retval = tracehook_init_task(p, clone_flags, trace);
+	if (retval)
+		goto bad_fork_free;
+
 	rt_mutex_init_task(p);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
--- PTRACE/kernel/ptrace.c~04_STRUCT	2009-05-30 22:44:41.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/kernel/ptrace.c	2009-05-30 22:57:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -174,6 +174,33 @@ bool ptrace_may_access(struct task_struc
 	return !err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check the task has ->ptrace_ctx or alloc the new one. Called
+ * from preemptible context when we are going to attach to this task.
+ * Once allocated, ->ptrace_ctx is never freed until free_task().
+ */
+int alloc_ptrace_context(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	struct ptrace_context *ptrace_ctx;
+
+	if (tsk->ptrace_ctx)
+		return 0;
+
+	ptrace_ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ptrace_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (unlikely(!ptrace_ctx))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	task_lock(tsk);
+	if (likely(!tsk->ptrace_ctx)) {
+		tsk->ptrace_ctx = ptrace_ctx;
+		ptrace_ctx = NULL;
+	}
+	task_unlock(tsk);
+	kfree(ptrace_ctx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	int retval;
@@ -199,6 +226,10 @@ int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *ta
 	if (retval)
 		goto unlock_creds;
 
+	retval = alloc_ptrace_context(task);
+	if (unlikely(retval))
+		goto unlock_creds;
+
 	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	retval = -EPERM;
 	if (unlikely(task->exit_state))
@@ -230,8 +261,12 @@ out:
  */
 int ptrace_traceme(void)
 {
-	int ret = -EPERM;
+	int ret = alloc_ptrace_context(current);
 
+	if (unlikely(ret))
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = -EPERM;
 	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	/* Are we already being traced? */
 	if (!task_ptrace(current)) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ