[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A221280.1050406@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 13:15:44 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jdike@...toit.com, mingo@...e.hu,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/4] module: trim exception table in module_free()
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 05:16:11 pm Amerigo Wang wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> __ex_table ends up with two entries:
>>>
>>> Contents of section __ex_table:
>>> 0000 0c000000 00000000 0e000000 00000000 ................
>>> 0010 10000000 0a000000 12000000 0a000000 ................
>>>
>>> The first is for the __put_user in .text (extable_not_init()) and the
>>> second is for the one in .init.text (init()).
>>>
>>> Depending on how the module gets allocated, the one referring to
>>> .init.text may be first or last.
>>>
>> Hmm, how about the following? :-)
>>
>> struct exception_table_entry *p = mod->extable;
>>
>> for (;p <= mod->extable+mod->num_exentries; p++ )
>> if (with_in_module_init(p->insn, mod))
>> trim_it(p);
>>
>
> More like this:
>
> void trim_init_extable(struct module *m)
> {
> /* Since entries are sorted, init entries are at the start... */
> while (m->num_exentries && within_module_init(m->extable[0].insn)) {
> m->extable++;
> m->num_exentries--;
> }
>
> /* ... or the end. */
> while (m->num_exentries && within_module_init(m->extable[m->num_exentries-1].insn))
> m->num_exentries--;
> }
>
Great! Thank you!
But does this works on all arch? Or only except sparc32?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists