[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020905302324r5e342f2dlfd711241ecfc8374@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:24:22 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Larry H." <research@...reption.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use kzfree in tty buffer management to enforce data
sanitization
Hi Linus,
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Larry H. wrote:
>>
>> This patch doesn't affect fastpaths.
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> This patch is ugly as hell.
>
> You already know the size of the data to clear.
>
> If we actually wanted this (and I am in _no_way_ saying we do), the only
> sane thing to do is to just do
>
> memset(buf->data, 0, N_TTY_BUF_SIZE);
> if (PAGE_SIZE != N_TTY_BUF_SIZE)
> kfree(...)
> else
> free_page(...)
>
>
> but quite frankly, I'm not convinced about these patches at all.
I wonder why the tty code has that N_TTY_BUF_SIZE special casing in
the first place? I think we can probably just get rid of it and thus
we can use kzfree() here if we want to.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists