[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2223FE.3000309@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:30:22 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Larry H." <research@...reption.com>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
pageexec@...email.hu,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator
Larry H. wrote:
> OK, I'm going to squeeze some time and provide patches that perform the
> same my original page bit ones did, but using kzfree. Behold code like
> in the tty buffer management, which uses the page allocator directly for
> allocations greater than PAGE_SIZE in length. That needs special
> treatment, and is exactly the reason I've proposed unconditional
> sanitization since the original patches were rejected.
You might want to also do the patch Alan suggested for the security
conscious people. That is, do a memset() in every page free and wrap
that under CONFIG_SECURITY_PARANOIA or something. There's no reason the
kzfree() patches and that can't co-exist.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists