[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020905310516x692bd870vfbbfc1e734e57326@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:16:55 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Larry H." <research@...reption.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
pageexec@...email.hu,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page
allocator
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Larry H. <research@...reption.com> wrote:
> Thanks for coming to the conclusion that unconditional memory
> sanitization is the correct approach.
>
> I thought this had been stated numerous times before in this thread. Are
> you serious about your responses or you are just clowning around? It's
> amusing, I give you that much.
So is this the same Larry that was able to have a productive and civil
discussion on #mm on IRC where he wanted me to ACK his patches? Or did
his evil identical twin take over the keyboard?
But anyway, enough is enough, and I really am not interested in this
discussion. I wish you the best of luck getting your patches merged. I
suspect you're gonna need it.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists