linux-kernel - Re: new implementation of mutex

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d364733c0906010157m416905f6xa166b562b70c9515@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:57:39 +0800
From:	谢纲 <xiegang112@...il.com>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new implementation of mutex

2009/6/1 Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>:
> 2009/6/1 谢纲 <xiegang112@...il.com>:
>> I debug it and find the debug_locks = 0.  Is this why there is no
>> warning message and how turn it on? (I also had CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
>> on.)
>
> Please confirm CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled.

It still does not work. No warning is found. It still behaves as
binary semophore.

Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Lei Ming
>



-- 
Xie Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/