linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] isdn: patches for 2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090601.030434.141357758.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tilman@...p.cc
Cc:	karsten-keil@...nline.de, isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de,
	i4ldeveloper@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] isdn: patches for 2.6.31

From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:32:04 +0200 (CEST)

> I would like to propose the following three patches to the Kernel CAPI
> subsystem for inclusion in kernel release 2.6.31.
> The first one was proposed four weeks ago and so far hasn't met any
> protests.
> The second one is a rather trivial bugfix and documentation improvement.
> The third one just adds a few new insights about the workings of the
> CAPI subsystem to the Documentation file, INTERFACE.CAPI.

I'm not applying this patch series.

Especially I dislike the second patch.

First problem in the second patch.  You're doing two things
at once.  You're adding function documentation and also adding
a NULL pointer check.

Second problem, the NULL pointer check is gratuitous.  Document
that the 'm' member has to be non-NULL and leave the check out.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/