[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2409C3.2000804@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:02:59 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, greg@...ah.com,
mingo@...e.hu, norsk5@...oo.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mchehab@...hat.com, aris@...hat.com, edt@....ca,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@...cle.com
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] amd64_edac: misc fixes
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Yes, we would have to do something like that.
>
> However, if you're doing that you shouldn't use typeof() there...
> instead this should be turned into an inline function with explicit
> 64-bit types.
>
> It would be good if we could get Kbuild to export some kind of macro
> that we can use to test binutils version, so we can do something like:
>
> #if BINUTILS_VERSION >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,18,50)
> /* Do the right thing */
> #else
> /* Do the wrong thing */
> #endif
>
The other option, and perhaps a better option, is to key it on the
version of gcc; then we can use the gcc intrinsics __builtin_popcount(),
__builtin_popcountl() and __builtin_popcountll(), which should produce
better code since gcc can schedule them appropriately.
Probably also means passing -msse4.2 to gcc while hoping that that
doesn't enable any #TS-generating instructions (SSE 4.2 is mostly a
collection of integer instructions).
(H.J., any comments?)
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists