linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:11:19 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	paul@...-scientist.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

On 06/01, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I think. As for other unhandled sig_fatal() signals, I am nor sure.
> > I can make a patch, but first I need to know what this patch should do.
> > Again, please look at:
>
> If you are on the command line then SIGINT/SIGQUIT would be the obvious
> ones for this ?

Not sure I understand. Do you mean we should treat the tty signals
specially ?

Personally, I don't think we should. If we decide that only SIGKILL
interrupts the coredumping, then I think ^C should not interrupt.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/