[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243876637-6616-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:17:13 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] tracing/workqueue: get rid of searching last executed worklet in probe_worklet_complete()
From: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
We don't need to search the worklet which was latest executed
inside the workqueue's worklet list.
Instead, we can use a pointer in cpu_workqueue_stats to remember
which worklet was last executed.
Thanks Oleg for pointing it out.
Changelog:
v1->v2: Oleg pointed out that if searching executed workfunc_stats failed
in probe_worklet_execute(), for example, workfunc_stats's memory allocation
failed previously, cpu_workqueue_stats->last_workfunc is not set to correct
value, and it will cause wrong accessing in probe_worklet_complete().
This problem is fixed in v2.
[ Impact: make worklet tracing faster ]
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
index c67be60..740de3b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
@@ -25,13 +25,6 @@ struct workfunc_stats {
unsigned int inserted;
unsigned int executed;
- /*
- * save latest work_struct's pointer to use as identifier in
- * probe_worklet_complete, because we can't use work_struct->...
- * after worklet got executed
- */
- void *work;
-
/* save execution time temporarily for calculate executed time */
u64 start_time;
u64 max_executed_time;
@@ -46,10 +39,17 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_stats {
/* Protected by cpu workqueue lock */
unsigned int inserted;
unsigned int executed;
+
/* list of struct workfunc_stats in this workqueue */
struct list_head workfunclist;
/*
+ * pointer to last executed worklet's workfunc_stats in this workqueue,
+ * used by probe_worklet_complete()
+ */
+ struct workfunc_stats *last_workfunc;
+
+ /*
* the task maybe destroyed when we read stat file
* we define it to void * because we only use it as a identifier
*/
@@ -163,9 +163,10 @@ found_wq:
if (wfnode->func == work->func) {
wfnode->executed++;
wfnode->start_time = trace_clock_global();
- wfnode->work = work;
+ node->last_workfunc = wfnode;
goto found_wf;
}
+ node->last_workfunc = NULL;
pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
goto end;
@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
{
int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
- struct workfunc_stats *wfnode;
+ u64 executed_time;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
@@ -192,22 +193,14 @@ probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
goto end;
found_wq:
- list_for_each_entry(wfnode, &node->workfunclist, list) {
- u64 executed_time;
+ if (!node->last_workfunc)
+ goto end;
- if (wfnode->work != work)
- continue;
+ executed_time = trace_clock_global() - node->last_workfunc->start_time;
+ node->last_workfunc->total_time += executed_time;
+ if (executed_time > node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time)
+ node->last_workfunc->max_executed_time = executed_time;
- executed_time = trace_clock_global() - wfnode->start_time;
- wfnode->total_time += executed_time;
- if (executed_time > wfnode->max_executed_time)
- wfnode->max_executed_time = executed_time;
- goto found_wf;
- }
- pr_debug("trace_workqueue: worklet not found\n");
- goto end;
-
-found_wf:
end:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workqueue_cpu_stat(cpu)->lock, flags);
}
--
1.6.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists