linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090601223455.00609acc@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:34:55 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	paul@...-scientist.net
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate

> If it's interactive, can't the user ^Z (SIGSTOP)

^Z is SIGTSTP but that would be one way to implement it although I think
it might need a bit more work than just setting masks.

> Yes, you need a shell with job control but... at some point we have to
> just say it is what it is!  Core dumps are not just annoying time/disk
> space wasters, they have real value; a good core dump can save tens of
> thousands of dollars or more in support and development costs.  We need
> (a way for) them to be reliable, even if it costs some interactive
> ease-of-use.
> 
> Anyway, that's my opinion :-)

And there we get into policy and preference rather than technical debate
- no right answers 8(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/