[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39efa6d3788eec04b0bc86b02d988c8f.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:33:07 +1000 (EST)
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "raz ben yehuda" <raziebe@...il.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: md tree build failure
On Mon, June 1, 2009 3:13 pm, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
>
>>> > Caused by commit e1defc4ff0cf57aca6c5e3ff99fa503f5943c1f1 ("block:
>>> > Do away with the notion of hardsect_size") from the block tree
>>> > interacting with commit 131e4477401ae76a9cbe8539e4b7819e04cfba36
>>> > ("md: raid0: chunk size check in raid0_run") from the md tree.
>
> Stephen> So, is anything happening about these? I still get these (and
> Stephen> the dm) build failures.
>
> There's a replacement DM patch kit brewing that will hopefully come your
> way shortly. It replaces the patches currently in Alasdair's tree.
> Mike sent the kit out for review last week and I'm currently testing it.
>
>
> I don't know what Neil's plans are. Neil: Do you want to rebase your
> tree, fix up the conflicting patches or how would you like to handle
> this?
I'm happy to rebase on something if you have a tree that doesn't have too
much more than the changes that are causing conflicts.
Then I'll fix my patches so they work on that tree.
What should I pull??
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists