[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090601231428.GF749@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:14:28 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: Provide functions for locking and
pinning the context for a task
* Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
>
> > -tip testing found that these patches are causing a crash:
>
> Argh. What was userspace doing at the time of the crash, do you
> know? It looks like it might have been on/off-lining a cpu,
> judging by the stack trace. Would there have been any counters
> attached to the task doing there, or were there any per-cpu
> counters active?
Yeah, indeed that box has a CPU hotplug testcase - sets cpu1 to
offline then online.
There should be no counters active anywhere during that.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists