| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:55:39 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tracing
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kmemcheck tree got a conflict in
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c between commit
aa20ae8444fc6c318272c643f856d8d8ad3e198d ("ring-buffer: move big if
statement down") from the tracing tree and commits
9b7ff384ee76ced9638ab236db588a6f13916336 ("trace: annotate bitfields in
struct ring_buffer_event") and 3467e18b1cf34c7d316af5717e7053ce845d014e
("kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C") from the kmemcheck
tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 3611706,c22506f..0000000
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@@ -1154,156 -1156,132 +1155,157 @@@ static unsigned rb_calculate_event_leng
return length;
}
+
static struct ring_buffer_event *
-__rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
- unsigned type, unsigned long length, u64 *ts)
+rb_move_tail(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
+ unsigned long length, unsigned long tail,
+ struct buffer_page *commit_page,
+ struct buffer_page *tail_page, u64 *ts)
{
- struct buffer_page *tail_page, *head_page, *reader_page, *commit_page;
- unsigned long tail, write;
+ struct buffer_page *next_page, *head_page, *reader_page;
struct ring_buffer *buffer = cpu_buffer->buffer;
struct ring_buffer_event *event;
- unsigned long flags;
bool lock_taken = false;
+ unsigned long flags;
- commit_page = cpu_buffer->commit_page;
- /* we just need to protect against interrupts */
- barrier();
- tail_page = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
- write = local_add_return(length, &tail_page->write);
- tail = write - length;
+ next_page = tail_page;
- /* See if we shot pass the end of this buffer page */
- if (write > BUF_PAGE_SIZE) {
- struct buffer_page *next_page = tail_page;
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ /*
+ * Since the write to the buffer is still not
+ * fully lockless, we must be careful with NMIs.
+ * The locks in the writers are taken when a write
+ * crosses to a new page. The locks protect against
+ * races with the readers (this will soon be fixed
+ * with a lockless solution).
+ *
+ * Because we can not protect against NMIs, and we
+ * want to keep traces reentrant, we need to manage
+ * what happens when we are in an NMI.
+ *
+ * NMIs can happen after we take the lock.
+ * If we are in an NMI, only take the lock
+ * if it is not already taken. Otherwise
+ * simply fail.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(in_nmi())) {
+ if (!__raw_spin_trylock(&cpu_buffer->lock)) {
+ cpu_buffer->nmi_dropped++;
+ goto out_reset;
+ }
+ } else
+ __raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
- local_irq_save(flags);
- /*
- * Since the write to the buffer is still not
- * fully lockless, we must be careful with NMIs.
- * The locks in the writers are taken when a write
- * crosses to a new page. The locks protect against
- * races with the readers (this will soon be fixed
- * with a lockless solution).
- *
- * Because we can not protect against NMIs, and we
- * want to keep traces reentrant, we need to manage
- * what happens when we are in an NMI.
- *
- * NMIs can happen after we take the lock.
- * If we are in an NMI, only take the lock
- * if it is not already taken. Otherwise
- * simply fail.
- */
- if (unlikely(in_nmi())) {
- if (!__raw_spin_trylock(&cpu_buffer->lock))
- goto out_reset;
- } else
- __raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
+ lock_taken = true;
- lock_taken = true;
+ rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &next_page);
- rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &next_page);
+ head_page = cpu_buffer->head_page;
+ reader_page = cpu_buffer->reader_page;
- head_page = cpu_buffer->head_page;
- reader_page = cpu_buffer->reader_page;
+ /* we grabbed the lock before incrementing */
+ if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, next_page == reader_page))
+ goto out_reset;
- /* we grabbed the lock before incrementing */
- if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, next_page == reader_page))
- goto out_reset;
+ /*
+ * If for some reason, we had an interrupt storm that made
+ * it all the way around the buffer, bail, and warn
+ * about it.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(next_page == commit_page)) {
+ cpu_buffer->commit_overrun++;
+ goto out_reset;
+ }
- /*
- * If for some reason, we had an interrupt storm that made
- * it all the way around the buffer, bail, and warn
- * about it.
- */
- if (unlikely(next_page == commit_page)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ if (next_page == head_page) {
+ if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE))
goto out_reset;
- }
-
- if (next_page == head_page) {
- if (!(buffer->flags & RB_FL_OVERWRITE))
- goto out_reset;
- /* tail_page has not moved yet? */
- if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
- /* count overflows */
- rb_update_overflow(cpu_buffer);
+ /* tail_page has not moved yet? */
+ if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
+ /* count overflows */
+ cpu_buffer->overrun +=
+ local_read(&head_page->entries);
- rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &head_page);
- cpu_buffer->head_page = head_page;
- cpu_buffer->head_page->read = 0;
- }
+ rb_inc_page(cpu_buffer, &head_page);
+ cpu_buffer->head_page = head_page;
+ cpu_buffer->head_page->read = 0;
}
+ }
- /*
- * If the tail page is still the same as what we think
- * it is, then it is up to us to update the tail
- * pointer.
- */
- if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
- local_set(&next_page->write, 0);
- local_set(&next_page->page->commit, 0);
- cpu_buffer->tail_page = next_page;
+ /*
+ * If the tail page is still the same as what we think
+ * it is, then it is up to us to update the tail
+ * pointer.
+ */
+ if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->tail_page) {
+ local_set(&next_page->write, 0);
+ local_set(&next_page->entries, 0);
+ local_set(&next_page->page->commit, 0);
+ cpu_buffer->tail_page = next_page;
+
+ /* reread the time stamp */
+ *ts = ring_buffer_time_stamp(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu);
+ cpu_buffer->tail_page->page->time_stamp = *ts;
+ }
- /* reread the time stamp */
- *ts = ring_buffer_time_stamp(buffer, cpu_buffer->cpu);
- cpu_buffer->tail_page->page->time_stamp = *ts;
- }
+ /*
+ * The actual tail page has moved forward.
+ */
+ if (tail < BUF_PAGE_SIZE) {
+ /* Mark the rest of the page with padding */
+ event = __rb_page_index(tail_page, tail);
++ kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(event, bitfield);
+ rb_event_set_padding(event);
+ }
- /*
- * The actual tail page has moved forward.
- */
- if (tail < BUF_PAGE_SIZE) {
- /* Mark the rest of the page with padding */
- event = __rb_page_index(tail_page, tail);
- kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(event, bitfield);
- rb_event_set_padding(event);
- }
+ /* Set the write back to the previous setting */
+ local_sub(length, &tail_page->write);
- if (tail <= BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
- /* Set the write back to the previous setting */
- local_set(&tail_page->write, tail);
+ /*
+ * If this was a commit entry that failed,
+ * increment that too
+ */
+ if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page &&
+ tail == rb_commit_index(cpu_buffer)) {
+ rb_set_commit_to_write(cpu_buffer);
+ }
- /*
- * If this was a commit entry that failed,
- * increment that too
- */
- if (tail_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page &&
- tail == rb_commit_index(cpu_buffer)) {
- rb_set_commit_to_write(cpu_buffer);
- }
+ __raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ /* fail and let the caller try again */
+ return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
+
+ out_reset:
+ /* reset write */
+ local_sub(length, &tail_page->write);
+ if (likely(lock_taken))
__raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->lock);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ return NULL;
+}
- /* fail and let the caller try again */
- return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
- }
+static struct ring_buffer_event *
+__rb_reserve_next(struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer,
+ unsigned type, unsigned long length, u64 *ts)
+{
+ struct buffer_page *tail_page, *commit_page;
+ struct ring_buffer_event *event;
+ unsigned long tail, write;
+
+ commit_page = cpu_buffer->commit_page;
+ /* we just need to protect against interrupts */
+ barrier();
+ tail_page = cpu_buffer->tail_page;
+ write = local_add_return(length, &tail_page->write);
+ tail = write - length;
+
+ /* See if we shot pass the end of this buffer page */
+ if (write > BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
+ return rb_move_tail(cpu_buffer, length, tail,
+ commit_page, tail_page, ts);
/* We reserved something on the buffer */
@@@ -1311,12 -1289,9 +1313,13 @@@
return NULL;
event = __rb_page_index(tail_page, tail);
+ kmemcheck_annotate_bitfield(event, bitfield);
rb_update_event(event, type, length);
+ /* The passed in type is zero for DATA */
+ if (likely(!type))
+ local_inc(&tail_page->entries);
+
/*
* If this is a commit and the tail is zero, then update
* this page's time stamp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists