[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A246D0B.40204@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:06:35 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/ntp] ntp: adjust SHIFT_PLL to improve NTP convergence
John Stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 01:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I might be missing something here - but Linux converging faster
>> seems like a genuinely good thing. What non-Linux problem could
>> there be? Linux's convergence is really Linux's private issue.
>
> Yea. It does seem that way. Miroslav can likely expand on the issue to
> help clarify, but as I understand it, the example is if you have a
> number of systems that are peers in an NTP network. All of them are
> using the same userland NTP daemon. However, if the rate of change that
> corrections are applied is different in half of them, you will have
> problems getting all the systems to converge together.
Would this not be true already, because the convergence
of Linux system suddenly became a lot slower in 2.6.19?
Damned if we do, damned if we don't - except the new
behaviour introduced by your patches is nicer.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists