lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090602155833.GA23657@alberich.amd.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:58:33 +0200
From:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To:	Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: provide CPU topology information for
	multi-node processors

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 05:05:07PM +0200, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 20:42, Andreas Herrmann
> <andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
> > This support can be switched off/on using a new config option
> > MULTI_NODE_CPU. If the option is set the CPU topology information is
> > extended with cpu_node information. This includes a cpu_node_id,
> > cpu_node_siblings and cpu_node_siblings_list.

> I think this would be a step back after commit
> c50cbb05a05cf1f9ca3592272eff053c847727d8. Which exported default
> topology information, in case the architecture does not provide these
> information.

I am fine with exporting default topology information for all
architectures.

I just wanted to avoid pollution of sysfs with useless information
when this information is not provided on an architecture.

Further thoughts -- e.g. concerning the MULTI_NODE_CPU config option?

If I provide defaults for cpu_node_id, cpu_node_siblings etc. the
config option becomes rather useless and I'll remove it.


Regards,
Andreas


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ