[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090602174125.GE4326@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:41:25 -0600
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] ACPI: simplify acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() API
* Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>:
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:25:16 am Alex Chiang wrote:
> > A PCI domain cannot change as you descend down subordinate buses, which
> > makes the 'segment' argument to acpi_pci_irq_add_prt() useless.
> >
> > Change the interface to take a struct pci_bus *, from whence we can derive
> > the bus number and segment. Reducing the number of arguments makes life
> > simpler for callers.
>
> Nice patch.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > index 25ddbb6..aa67f72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -537,8 +537,9 @@ static int __devinit acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> > */
> > status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, METHOD_NAME__PRT, &handle);
> > if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> > - result = acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(device->handle, root->id.segment,
> > - root->id.bus);
> > + result = acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(device->handle,
> > + pci_find_bus(root->id.segment,
> > + root->id.bus));
>
> I think you can just do this:
>
> acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(device->handle, root->bus);
Ah, indeed you are right, thanks Bjorn.
Len, would you like me to respin, or can you just make the
modification for me?
Thanks.
/ac
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists