[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090602024306.GB21564@hallyn.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:43:06 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: lizf@...fujitsu.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] TOMOYO: Clarify lock protected section.
Quoting Tetsuo Handa (penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp):
> Li Zefan wrote:
> > Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Enclose reader section in
> > > /***** READER SECTION START *****/
> > > and
> > > /***** READER SECTION END *****/
> > > and writer section in
> > > /***** WRITER SECTION START *****/
> > > and
> > > /***** WRITER SECTION END *****/
> > > in order to avoid oversighting lock protected section.
> > >
> >
> > This makes me a bit uncomfortable..
> >
> > IMHO this seems ugly, useless, and even harmful. If it's helpful,
> > we'd be doing this for the whole kernel tree, which is crazy..
> >
> > Or does tomoyo do this for it's special reason?
>
> I intended to help reviewers to visualize the range of protected section
> at a glance. But if reviewers feel noisy, I can remove these markers.
No, the real problem is that you have "protected sections" at all.
You should be locking data, not code. (Apparently a quote to be attributed
to Alan Cox - huh)
See the bottom of:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/kernel-locking/x376.html
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists