[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090603075019.GD11363@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:50:19 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"chris.mason@...cle.com" <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jack@...e.cz" <jack@...e.cz>,
"yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
"richard@....demon.co.uk" <richard@....demon.co.uk>,
"damien.wyart@...e.fr" <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v9
On Wed, Jun 03 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Just to make sure I understood you correctly. I assume my original
>>> patch is fine (because there is bdi_destroy()) and merge it to
>>> ubifs tree.
>>
>> It needs to be:
>>
>> err = bdi_register(&c->bdi, NULL, "ubifs");
>> if (err)
>> goto out_bdi;
>>
>> so you hit the bdi_destroy() for that failure, not goto out_close;
>> Otherwise it was fine.
>
> Ah, I see. Rather non-typical convention though. I expected
> bdi_register() to clean-up stuff in case of failure. Isn't
> it a better interface?
You already did a bdi_init() at that point. bdi_destroy() must be used
to clean up after both bdi_init() and/or bdi_register().
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists