linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the ttydev tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090603204655.3f431574.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:46:55 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Craig Shelley <craig@...rotron.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the ttydev tree

Hi Alan,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:55:47 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > As a side issue, the last patch has no SOB from Craig in the ttydev tree.
> 
> Yes it does...
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Craig Shelley <craig@...rotron.org.uk>
>     
>     (Fixed some collisions merging)
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>

Sorry, going blind in my old age :-)

> > So, I just used the ttydev tree version on the assumption that my
> > reasoning above is correct.
> 
> and the ttydev tree one is the one to use

Thanks for the confirmation.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped