[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090603140742.GA22953@tango.0pointer.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:07:43 +0200
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling
policy flag, Second try
On Fri, 29.05.09 10:38, Lennart Poettering (mzxreary@...inter.de) wrote:
> This patch introduces a new flag SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK which can be passed
> to the kernel via sched_setscheduler(), ORed in the policy parameter. If
> set this will make sure that when the process forks a) the scheduling
> priority is reset to DEFAULT_PRIO if it was higher and b) the scheduling
> policy is reset to SCHED_NORMAL if it was either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
[...]
> This current patch compiles but is not otherwise tested. For now, I am
> sending this primarily as a request for comments. So please, I'd love to
> hear your comments!
I have now done some testing to make sure it actually works as
advertised. Everything seems to be fine. For those interested here's a
little test program that verifies that RR scheduling is properly
removed from the child process but is kept enabled in the parent process:
http://0pointer.de/public/reset-on-fork.c
Ingo, how can I bribe you into taking this patch, or at least
commenting on it?
Thanks,
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists