linux-kernel - [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090603152223.083010123@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:22:23 +0200
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob van der Heij <rvdheij@...il.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2

Greetings,
version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt()
fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with
the issue.
Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to
the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2
with another tick_nohz_disable().

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/