linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244042950.4862.10.camel@johannes.local>
Date:	Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:29:10 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (rfkill)

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 08:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> CFG80211=y
> MAC80211=y
> RFKILL=m
> 
> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call':
> core.c:(.text+0xa678b): undefined reference to `rfkill_blocked'
> net/built-in.o: In function `cfg80211_dev_free':

Hrm. I thought

config CFG80211
	tristate "Improved wireless configuration API"
	depends on RFKILL || !RFKILL

would avoid that. Why doesn't it?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)