[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0fb38c0906030932o28d5c963y8059672e5c2c7ecf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:32:07 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Larry H." <research@...reption.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: Security fix for remapping of page 0 (was [PATCH] Change
ZERO_SIZE_PTR to point at unmapped space)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
>>
>> As I recall the only need for CONFIG_SECURITY is for the ability to
>> override the check.
>
> No, if you have SECURITY disabled entirely, the check goes away.
I meant 'need' as in the reason I wrapped it in CONFIG_SECURITY, not
that you were wrong when you said it disapeared.
>> I think I could probably pretty cleanly change it to use
>> CAP_SYS_RAWIO/SELinux permissions if CONFIG_SECURITY and just allow it
>> for uid=0 in the non-security case?
>
> We probably should, since the "capability" security version should
> generally essentially emulate the regular non-SECURITY case for root.
Will poke/patch this afternoon.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists