[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0fb38c0906031016m77416390v37fb0673e6e50501@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:16:14 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Larry H." <research@...reption.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: Security fix for remapping of page 0 (was [PATCH] Change
ZERO_SIZE_PTR to point at unmapped space)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> The other mistake is to think that SELinux is sane, or should be the
> default. It's a f*cking complex disaster, and makes performance plummet on
> some things.
While I think you couldn't be more wrong I'm not going to argue that topic....
I am at least interested in hearing about the 'performance plummet.'
I don't see any performance reports on my todo list but I am
interested in banging on any that people report. Last performance
thing I heard anything about was Ingo doing some profiling of of a
network stack benchmark in which SELinux was eating a percent or two
his time. I cut the SELinux performance penalty by about 50% on my
systems in that benchmark. If others have complaints let me or the
selinux list know....
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists