[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e0fb38c0906031031t551f566fxc4ff2f08a73f807f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:31:56 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Larry H." <research@...reption.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: Security fix for remapping of page 0 (was [PATCH] Change
ZERO_SIZE_PTR to point at unmapped space)
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Eric Paris wrote:
>>
>> I am at least interested in hearing about the 'performance plummet.'
>
> It's perhaps not so much SElinux itself, but the AUDIT support (which it
> requires) that is really _very_ noticeable on microbenchmarks.
>
> Last time I ran lmbench on a Fedora kernel it was horrible. Turning off
> AUDIT (which also turns off SElinux) fixes it.
>
> It may be crazy distro auditing rules or whatever, but that doesn't change
> the basic issue.
Probably AUDITSYSCALL, not AUDIT. SELinux only needs AUDIT. I'll
poke that too someday, thanks.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists