linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Dynamic ACPI-PCI binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090603192903.GA10885@ldl.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:29:03 -0600
From:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
To:	lenb@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Dynamic ACPI-PCI binding

Hi Len,

* Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>:
> This patch series eliminates static boot-time binding of ACPI
> and PCI devices, and introduces an API to perform this lookup
> during runtime.
> 
> This change has the following advantages:
> 
> 	- eliminates struct acpi_device vs struct pci_dev lifetime issues
> 	- lays groundwork for eliminating .bind/.unbind from acpi_device_ops
> 	- lays more groundwork for eliminating .start from acpi_device_ops
> 	  and thus simplifying ACPI drivers
> 	- whacks out a lot of code
> 
> This patchset is based on lenb/test (66c74fa1d4).

I'm going to address Bjorn's comments and respin this series.

Thanks.

/ac

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/