linux-kernel - Re: [patch] epoll - send POLLHUP on ->release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0906031246030.18001@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] epoll - send POLLHUP on ->release

On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:20:26 -0400
> Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com> wrote:
> 
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > The following patch allows waiters to be notified about the eventfd file* 
> > > going away, and give them a change to unregister from the wait queue.
> > > This is turn allows eventfd users to use the eventfd file* w/out 
> > > holding a live reference to it.
> > > After the eventfd user callbacks returns, any usage of the eventfd file* 
> > > should be dropped. The eventfd user callback can acquire sleepy locks 
> > > since it is invoked lockless.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
> > >   
> > 
> > Tested-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
> 
> Confused.  Did you test this with some new kernel patch, or with some
> existing kernel code?
> 
> If the latter, what code are we talking about here and what was the test
> case and what went wrong when using the current mainline
> implementation?

Andrew, this is not related to a bug in mainline. It's an helper for 
IRQFD, that allows them to not hold reference counts over the underlying 
eventfd.
I believe this has been tested using Gregory's IRQFD code.



- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/