[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1skihm1pk.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:44:55 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3 (driver core)
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 08:50:10AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Looks like a real rush since -rc7 ...
>>
>>
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `register_mem_sect_under_node':
>> (.text+0x1d305b): undefined reference to `sysfs_create_link_nowarn'
>>
>>
>> I can't find this function's implementation when CONFIG_SYSFS=y.
>
> Ah, it looks like this shows up when CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE is
> set.
>
> Eric, your patch, "sysfs: Remove now unnecessary error reporting
> suppression." caused this. Turns out it is still used in the tree, and
> you forgot to remove the function from sysfs.h at the same time.
>
> I'm going to drop it, and the other two patches I took from you for
> sysfs, as it doesn't make sense to have them in the tree yet.
>
> Care to rework your series with this fixed?
Sure.
My apologies it looks like sysfs_create_link_nowarn grew an extra
user since last time I audited that patch thoroughly.
How I missed the header I don't know.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists