[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A2619E1.60808@goop.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:36:17 +1000
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Christophe Saout <chtephan@...o.intern.saout.de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] paravirtualize IO permission bitmap
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sigh, is there a plan to limit the paravirt horror at some point or
> are we keeping on adding to it forever ?
>
There haven't been any new ops added in a long time. We've had one for
iopl for a long while; this fills it out to be fully functional. I
don't see a need for any more ops with the current architecture.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists