[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0906040306j4c06c4efhbfa5ab47de590527@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:06:48 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio sysfs: add a "toggle" value
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 05:48, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > I don't like the idea of embedding any kind of interpreter
>> > in the sysfs interface, but that's the direction you seem
>> > to be heading ...
>>
>> i dont view the userspace GPIO interface as a simple "i want to wiggle
>> pins for fun and testing". i see it as a dynamic method for building
>> userspace drivers for simple devices.
>
> I don't. I see it as an adjunct to real drivers. Or maybe
> we just differ on what "simple" means here.
>
>> as such, having a very simple
>> "command language" for optimizing the interaction provides a pretty
>> good trade off between kernel complexity and lowering overhead imo.
>
> If that's what you want, why don't you write a custom driver
> that provides the kind of command interpreter you want?
i had "simple-gpio" but it was rejected as it duplicated too much with
the gpio sysfs interface
does vectored writes (writve) work with sysfs ? if so, then that
should work for back-to-back commands rather than having sysfs do
stream parsing.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists