[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090604015935.GA30472@shareable.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:59:35 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denis Karpov <ext-denis.2.karpov@...ia.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...ia.com, artem.bityutskiy@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] FS: userspace notification of errors
Andrew Morton wrote:
> The "unclean" term doesn't seem a good fit. It usually means "has
> in-memory data which needs writing back". But here you've redefined
> "unclean" to mean "got an IO error" or "detected metadata
> inconsistency", or perhaps "dunno, please run fsck to find out". This
> all should be spelled out in exacting detail and thought about, please.
I agree. "unclean" (or "dirty") should be reserved for indicating
that the filesystem has been modified, that is, files written to etc.
Use another term like "fault" or "error"?
-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists