[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A27D0FE.5000609@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:49:50 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: ying.huang@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/2] KVM: Add VT-x machine check support
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> There's no good place as it breaks the nice exit handler table. You
>> could put it in vmx_complete_interrupts() next to NMI handling.
>>
>
> I think I came up with a easy cheesy but not too bad solution now that should
> work. It simply remembers the CPU in the vcpu structure and schedules back to
> it. That's fine for this purpose.
>
We might be able schedule back in a timely manner. Why not hack
vmx_complete_interrupts()? You're still in the critical section so
you're guaranteed no delays or surprises.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists