lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A27E448.3040305@trash.net>
Date:	Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:12:08 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
CC:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	slapin@...fans.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] net: add NL802154 interface for configuration of
 	802.15.4 devices

Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> 2009/6/4 Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>:
>> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 16:27 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>
>>>>> +static int ieee802154_nl_put_failure(struct sk_buff *msg)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + void *hdr = genlmsg_data(NLMSG_DATA(msg->data)); /* XXX: nlh is right at the start of msg */
>>>>> + genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>>>>> + nlmsg_free(msg);
>>>>> + return -ENOBUFS;
>>>>> +}
>>>> This seems weird.
>>> Why?
>> Because it's strange to cancel then free?
> 
>>>From looking at the other code, the usual pattern for netlink is
> (please, correct me if I'm wrong):
> 
> int fill (....)
> {
>    genlmsg_put();
>    NLA_PUT(...)
>    NLA_PUT(...)
>    return genlmsg_end();
> 
> nla_put_failure:
>    genlmsg_cancel();
>    return -EMSGSIZE;
> }
> 
> int cmd(...)
> {
>     int rc;
>     nlmsg_new();
> 
>     rc = fill();
>     if (rc < 0)
>         goto out;
> 
>     genlmsg_unicast();
> 
> out:
>     nlmsg_free();
>     return -ENOBUFS;
> }
> 
> This is equivalent to our code:
> 
> sk_buff *new()
> {
>    msg = nlmsg_new();
>    genlmsg_put();
>    return msg;
> }

canceling messages is only necessary in fill functions that are
also used for dumps, where as many elements are stuffed in the
skb as possible. When the last element doesn't completely fit,
its removed again (canceled) and put into the next skb.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ