[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090604171458.F0DC7FC3C3@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, paul@...-scientist.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Retry writes where appropriate
> Fortunately, this doesn't look hard. Whatever we do, we should modify
> dump_write/seek to check fatal_signal_pending() anyway. Because we can't
> know if f_ops->write() pays attention to signals.
Yes, that sounds fine.
> This means we can just add try_to_freeze().
Right.
> As for exit_mm(), we can use freezer_do_not_count() + freezer_count()
> around the "for (;;)" loop.
Ah yes, sure.
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists