[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A281F33.80606@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:23:31 +0200
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
CC: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: prevent dangling block device from accessing stale
queues
Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:00:42PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
>> Hm, not sure this is what you wanted to know... On the launchpad report
>> there are logs which I took with lots of printk's enabled. This shows that
>> after resume the queue receives a request from mmcblk0 (which no longer
>> exists) but uses the same pointer as mmcblk1 which was just created.
>>
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but why is the device instance being
> destroyed during a suspend? E.g why do you have mmcblk0 before suspend and
> mmcblk1 after suspend?
That is the way mmcblock works (without unsafe resume set) in conjunction with
( probably ) slow userspace. On suspend the block device is removed. But the
mount is cleaned by (in that case hald) doing a forced unmount. The timeing
seems to be that the unmount part is partially done on the way up.
--
When all other means of communication fail, try words!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists